Blog post 18

Blog post 18

        For my ELA response project I chose to film a movie with Sage, Andrew, and Xander included in my group.  For the most part, it went pretty well, there were definitely some things we did better on than others, and some things that needed much improvement looking back on the experience now. For example, I think that the screenplay was very good and the writing of the movie that was contributed by all four members of my group. Also there were bits and pieces during the acting part that really came together, and other instances where it didn't work as well. A way we could improve would be that I think we could have used more focus and tried harder to memorize our lines. Although the acting I felt was a very strong element in our production there were things we didn't do as well on. The biggest mistake we made on set was when we hadn't noticed that the camera was leaning slightly down in one of the scenes resulting in our heads being cropped out of the shot. And the mistake we made was that we trusted our cameraman Ilan’s judgement that the take was good, instead of reviewing it ourselves. Evidently this blooper made it into the final cut, as we had no other choice but to include it because it was our only good take. In conclusion to this project review, I would deem it a success and would definitely think about doing it again. Except next time, I’ll remember to review the all of the shots!   

Blog post 17

Francesco Argentina
Ms. Harrison
ELA
2/21/17
Blog post 17
“Who was the protagonist in The Merchant of Venice”?
         For my blog this week I chose to write about who was the protagonist in the story, The Merchant of Venice. Really there are two characters that have enough relevance in the story to take the role of the protagonist, and those two characters are Antonio, and Shylock. In the story there is no direct indication which one is the protagonist so I will only be talking about my personal opinion. The English audience at that time would have definitely assumed the Christian Antonio as the protagonist, and Shylock as the evil villain, but now that we think more rationally as we asses Shakespeare's work it could be called either way. For my personal opinion I think that Shylock is the protagonist in this story, and he faces many conflicts through the antagonist Antonio mistreating him. This would mean that the end of the play would be a tragedy rather than a comedy which was originally suggested by the English audience.

The quality of mercy

Francesco Argentina

Ms. Harrison

ELA

February, 13

Blog post 16

Towards the end of the play, Portia disguised as a doctor, makes a very interesting speech on Antonio's behalf towards Shylock. She talks about the quality of mercy in contrast to justice. All this is just to save her husbands best friend from having a chunk of flesh carved out of him. She uses this speech to try and persuade Shylock to be merciful and spare Antonio. In this speech she stresses the importance of mercy, and explains how mercy is a blessing from the gods, and how it is the holy spirits way of making you do the right thing. She says that anyone can choose justice, but it takes a real courageous man to choose the act of mercy. I found some of this speech to be kind of ironic as Shylock, being jewish doesn't even believe in the god which she talks about in the speech which might be some of the reason as to why her attempt to persuade him did not even work. Overall however, I do believe what she is saying about how showing mercy might not be the easiest option and how it does take a lot of courage to show an act of mercy especially when someone that you hate is sitting right in front of you waiting for you to cut into him.        

blog post 15

Francesco Argentina

Ms. Harrison

ELA

1/29/17

Blog post 15

Prompt: Shylock's speech

In the play The Merchant of Venice, Shakespeare presents this interesting concept through his writing and through the character Shylock where he gives a very thought provoking speech about Jews and their feelings about the way the Christians look down on them and shines some light on the anti-semitism based society in which Shakespeare lived. This particular speech by Shylock was especially significant during this time because of the effect it had on the audience of Shakespeare's play. I would assume that to the white christian male audience, that the idea of being sympathetic towards the Jews would be absurd and not socially acceptable. For example, another playwright Marlowe, had previously written a play called The Jew of Malta in which the Jewish character was portrayed as a horrible villain with no positive qualities, and this is what the culture thought was acceptable at the time. So for Shakespeare to go and put this speech in his play, it was an incredibly controversial thing that he did and was the first time that this way of thinking rationally about the Jew’s feelings was introduced. From Shakespeare's perspective, he was just thinking about selling tickets and making money, but maybe including this monologue was actually a great business move as it most likely caused a lot of drama in the media, resulting in people going to see his show, because as we all know, controversy is what sells. In conclusion, I think this message was very beneficial to the development of this society in terms of our consideration for other cultures feelings and opinions.